Dear
Friends,
Good morning. Happy New Year! For
2006, I’ve decided to periodically add a P.S. to my columns so I can include
additional, unrelated items. I’ll call it “Kernels of knowledge” (a real
Meredith oxymoron). But today’s major topic is how close to property tax reform
are we?
State Representative Paul Clymer
gave me his predictions when I called him last week. I’d read State
Representative Mario Scavello’s Op-ed piece in the Morning Call (Dec. 27). The
“It promises $2 billion in school
property tax relief by using revenue from the state sales tax and state
personal income tax to offset, dollar for dollar, up to 50 percent of each
homeowner’s school property tax,” Scavello wrote. It also uses gambling
proceeds.
The state senate alternative is
similar. However, neither plan includes using voter referenda to keep the 501
school boards’ feet to the fire. And Paul Clymer says that’s precisely what is
missing. In
“The Governor wants a referendum
included in the plan and he’s right,” Clymer began. “I don’t see any bill
succeeding without a voter referendum to put brakes on school district
spending.”
I asked him whether it would be
better to allow the 501 school districts to determine how to finance public
education…let the districts choose what’s best for their residents…property
tax, or sales tax, or income tax, or a combination? Wouldn’t the voters oust
school directors who chose an unpopular method, I wondered? Clymer told me that
he likes the concept…but not without the presence of voter referenda.
Last summer, Clymer met with
Clymer believes that there will be
no progress unless there’s consensus reached between the major
players…teachers’ unions and school boards. And unless there’s willingness for
them to accept the principal of referendum, nothing will eliminate the logjam.
“[School] Administrators and school
boards dislike referendums, but it’s necessary,” Clymer continued. “You have to
have controls.”
He predicts that both houses won’t
address property tax reform until after the state farm show this month (in
about three weeks). In addition, Clymer is a well-known opponent of gambling.
If it’s included, will he vote No? We’ll see.
How close to a compromise is there,
I asked him?
“Charlie,” he replied. “It’s like
holding onto a slippery eel. “You think you have it and then you don’t.”
Stay tuned.
Sincerely,
Charles Meredith
And
here are Kernels of “Knowledge.”
(1) Hope Weisshaar Asrelsky was
one of the super stars of our Quakertown class of 1953. Although she lives near
Ground Zero in
(2) Did you see the photo of
Bill Harr, Sr. and Ronald Heller in the Inquirer on Christmas day? Under the
caption “Best Find: Sine’s 5 & 10,” the two classmates were sharing a
laugh. Harr is Sine’s proprietor. Heller used to own a barbershop and was a
popular and outspoken Quakertown councilman.
(3) I was “heartened” to read
that the U. S. Government has published a 123-page document promulgating rules
for passenger space travel! Can you imagine how many millions of our tax money
was devoted to this boondoggle?
(4) I had an interesting chat
with Father Bernie O’Connor about the prospects of De Sales University
launching a medical school. We’ll visit that subject soon. Presently the
(5) State Senator Joe Conti
maybe on the chopping block. Bucks County Republican Chairman Harry Fawkes is
running a poll to see if Conti continues to be unpopular. Because Conti voted
for an unpopular pay raise last summer, you might see State Representative
Chuck McIlhinney opposing him in the primary this spring.
(6) Finally, I understand why
cats are smarter than dogs. The skunk provides the answer. I’ve witnessed our
family cat, “Rainbow,” calmly stroll toward a skunk until their noses touch.
After a short "Tete a Tete," our cat wonders off…no damage done. On
the other hand, our Golden Retriever, “Sprout,” could hardly wait to pounce
upon a skunk with disastrous results. The difference between Mighty Betsy and
me is like Rainbow and Sprout. It just comes down to brainpower. MB wouldn’t
jump on a skunk. She’s too smart for that. But I would.